翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Norton Street, Leichhardt ・ Norton Subcourse ・ Norton Summit, South Australia ・ Norton System Insight ・ Norton SystemWorks ・ Norton Tool Co Ltd v Tewson ・ Norton Township ・ Norton Township, Jefferson County, Kansas ・ Norton Township, Kankakee County, Illinois ・ Norton Township, Walsh County, North Dakota ・ Norton Township, Winona County, Minnesota ・ Norton tradition ・ Norton United F.C. ・ Norton University ・ Norton Utilities ・ Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ・ Norton Village Historic District ・ Norton Villiers Triumph ・ Norton Water Tower ・ Norton Woodseats F.C. ・ Norton Zinder ・ Norton Zone ・ Norton's Coin ・ Norton's Corner School ・ Norton's dome ・ Norton's Star Atlas ・ Norton's theorem ・ Norton, Buckland and Stone ・ Norton, California ・ Norton, County Durham Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ： ウィキペディア英語版 Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ''Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance'' 542 U.S. 55 (2004) was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Act says that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act. Therefore, in this case, an interest group could not challenge an agency's failure to "act so as to preserve the wilderness" in accordance with the statute. ==Background== Under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the federal Bureau of Land Management is required to manage "2.5 million acres of land in Utah" called "wilderness study areas." The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and other environmentalist groups filed suit under the Administrative Procedure Act, compelling the government to act when "an agency has failed to meet its legal duties." The Wilderness Alliance claimed that the Bureau of Land Management had failed to adequately protect the study areas and that the bureau permitted off-road vehicle use that damaged the study areas, violating the act passed by Congress in 1976.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2003/2003_03_101 )〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.